 |
| LOA |
34'8" |
Weight |
15,000 |
| Beam |
13'0" |
Fuel |
340 gals |
| Draft |
3' 1" |
Engines* |
Cat 3116, 300 hp |
| Year |
1995 |
Production |
1993-2000 |
* Engine options include various choices of
gas and diesel. |
Several weeks prior to this writing, I was out on a sea trail on a
Bertram, heading down the New River, and as we passed a Luhrs dealership
which had a number of new Luhrs models lined up along the river, the yacht
broker and captain were making comments about how crappy the Luhrs boats
are.
Several months ago, I was perusing a blue water fishing forum where I
ran across discussion about a late model Luhrs that had gone down off the
coast of Texas with some loss of life. There was much speculation that the
cause of that boat sinking was a hull defect. It later turned out that
lack of maintenance was the cause, but not knowing the cause didn't stop
people from casting aspersions.
Yesterday I thought about these things as I crawled around in a 5 year
old Luhrs 320, wondering if any of these people could be talking about the
same boat that I was currently looking at. For the fact is that the hull
on this boat was particularly well built. I couldn't help but be impressed
by the size of the framing system, which greatly exceeds most everything
else in its class. This hull is solid glass on the bottom and is foam
cored on the sides. It has conventional glass over wood framing that
looked to contain numerous layers of roving with no incompleteness of the
laminating. In other words, no half-assed layup leaving exposed wood here
and there.
The overlaps of the tabbing of bulkheads was a good 4" and none of
the tabs had broken loose. Not so much as a single crack anywhere, which
is not something I could say for recent surveys on a comparably sized Cabo
and Albermarle. There were no stress cracks anywhere on bottom or hull
sides, and very few stress cracks within cockpit or on decks. The struts
had massive doublers backing them up. The engine bed stringers looked
quite beefy, nor was there any defection while underway.
With that in mind, I had to wonder why so many people have dim views of
these boats. In part, it's the ignorance and snobbery of those who can
afford higher priced boats. And in part, it's due to the fact that these
ARE price boats wherein the cost is lowered as a result of having lower
quality and fewer frills in the places where it is less important. There
is no denying that there is a dearth of quality hardware, and that above
decks you will find designs that are less fancy and not as good as you
might expect. For example, the hatches on the cockpit under seat storage
lockers do not have gutters, nor does the rope locker. Door and hatch
pulls are mostly plastic. And so on. But the point here is that where
quality is needed, you'll find it there.
Perhaps another contributor is the design style. Heretofore, we
associated it with the likes of Rybovich and other high end custom or semi
custom boats. Now we have one that is not only a high production
boat, but one that comes with an affordable price to those who otherwise
would be bouncing around in Bayliners.
Oddly enough, if you go stomping around up on that huge expanse of
foredeck, you'll find it to be very solid. It won't bend and the whole
boat won't shake when you do so. Same goes for the cockpit deck, which
does not bounce when you jump on it, nor are there any cracks around the
hatches like I find even on much higher priced boats.
The cabin is very nicely laid out. Thanks to the very wide beam forward
and huge bow flare, it's far bigger than anything else in its class. The
vee berth area is laid out like lounge seating, with the vee spread wide
and with sufficient space overhead, which is permissible only because of
the hull shape. The galley is a bit on the disappointing side, but
possibly this was because the largeness of the interior leads one to
expect more than most 32 foot boats can deliver. With this size boat, you
can't have everything. For the lack of an adequate galley, you get a very
adequate head compartment, which is walk-in, stand up, and fully
fiberglass lined, albeit without dedicated shower stall which would be
asking too much.
Paneled in teak veneers, it has solid drawer fronts and other trim that
comes with maybe two coats of varnish, but needs more if you expect it to
hold up. A molded fiberglass headliner is easy to keep clean, but does not
provide nice interior acoustics. A 3/4 height reefer causes a split level
countertop (cast plastic) and a 2 burner electric hotplate set at a rather
high level, although the way it's recessed will prevent pans from sliding
off.
One interesting feature is the way the electric panel is built in to
the molded FRP overhead liner. It's in an angled console hanging from
above and facing aft. As you walk down the companionway steps into the
cabin, it looks like you'll mash your head on it, but you don't.
There's lots of cubby hole storage available. The spaces under the
lounge seats are lined with carpet and the odd thing was that I didn't
find much in the way of leaks. Although I could not prove the point, it
seemed that the hull/deck join was likely glassed.
The cockpit is divided into aft and forward sections with a raised step
up. In the midst of the forward cockpit is a center console with controls,
a set up that I found most unimpressive. Various switches are mounted on a
painted, stenciled aluminum strip panel which was in a condition that I
hardly need to describe and had become an eyesore in only a few years
time. This was a lousy place for designers to try to save a few bucks
because it makes the boat look old before it's time.
The console is too small to mount any kind of optional gizmos, so the
place to do that is in the drop down overhead electronic box molded into
the fiberglass hardtop, a fairly decent arrangement in my view. It's high
enough that you won't hit your head on it. The placement of the wheel and
controls was good, this one having the high end Morse cable controls;
don't know if these are optional or standard, but they look nice.
 |
| Engines closely spaced make this one
very tight
engine room. It would be nice to at least have
some decking to stand on instead of the batteries. |
The engine compartment was a sore spot for me, as are all these boats
which have these huge hinged decks that tilt up on one end. This one had
pneumatic cylinder lift assists that did not assist much, making lifting
the hatches a grunt and groan affair. One person can do it, but it's not
easy. Fitted with a pair of Cat 3116's that barely fit height clearance
wise, the engines are brought very close together in order to get them in
there, and that's where your maintenance nightmares begin.
Fuel filters, transmission dipsticks and stuffing boxes are all but
impossible to reach. So is anything on the outboard sides of the engines,
where there is actually a lot of space, but the hatch, lifting up to only
a shallow angle, won't permit access. The generator is stuffed between the
front of starboard engine and the bulkhead, rendering it a joy to service.
It was no surprise that the engine room is dirty with a lot of rust over
everything once you note that the cockpit seat boxes are drained directly
into this compartment; the first thing I noticed after opening the hatch
was water splashing around. Though this easily corrected, the amount of
damage caused by this oversight is not. The helm console also leaks water
into the deteriorating foil and foam deck insulation, spreading the water
around. A recent engine starting motor replacement apparently having been
a recent victim.
Offsetting these faults are two 8D 12 volt batteries so there's no
shortage of battery power, though the location of the main switches and
circuit breakers at the front of the engine room was piss-poor placement.
So was locating the aluminum water tank outboard of the port engine: you
have to keep it full to maintain proper trim. It wasn't until the boat was
hauled that it was noticed that there are no internal sea strainers on the
main engines, just perforated stainless screens on the bottom of the hull.
That's the bad news; the good news is that this boat performs
reasonably well. We had a light chop on top of a two foot swell that
resulted in a fair test of rough water performance, which I judged to be
acceptable. Especially considering that I measured the dead rise at a mere
18 degrees aft. At 15,000 lbs. she's neither heavy nor light, yet the ride
gave a definite sense of being a heavy boat. The bow did not fly up every
time it hit a wave. Nowadays, with boats getting so light, our perception
of what is a good ride versus bad is changing: If you can go 25 knots
without your passengers getting injured, that is good. Forget about
pleasant versus unpleasant. Boats just aren't heavy enough anymore to give
a pleasant ride in anything but calm conditions, and even that is
debatable at times.
In any case, I felt that the performance was neither great nor poor,
but somewhere in the middle. The Cat 300's pushed her to a top speed of
29.3 knots with four blade props. The hull rides at a rather high angle of
attack (around 9-10 degrees) and the trim tabs don't do a lot to bring the
bow down. This is largely due to the single 340 gallon fuel tank being
located far aft. Thus, it's a little slow to get up on an efficient plane
which is not achieved until around 2000 RPM. Otherwise, considering her
vital statistics, she should be a fairly efficient fuel burner.
Even though this style boat market niche has not, heretofore, been
invaded by price leaders, this is a price boat. There's nothing wrong with
that so long as her builders do not chintz on the important basics, such
as solid structures. There's no problem with that here, for the basic
structures are as good as you'll find at twice the price. The corners that
are cut are in the area of fancy and/or top quality hardware and fittings,
and a little less of this and that, but you'll have to look close to find
identify where they've clipped the coins. Such as no cockpit coaming
padding, a Spartan helm panel, and so on. On balance, these are
intelligent trade-offs toward reducing costs. To sum up, I felt that the
positives outweigh the negatives, and that altogether it's a pretty nice
little boat that delivers good value for the money.
| These are
"reviews", not surveys, and bear no resemblance to our survey
reports. We do not publish
the results of the surveys that we perform. Please note that the purpose
of these reviews is educational, to help you discern the differences in
quality among boats generally. They are not offered as a means to help
you evaluate any particular boat builder. We have no other reviews than
those posted. |
|