|
| LOA: |
30' 7" |
Engines: |
Yanmar 300 hp |
| Beam: |
11' 4" |
Cruise range: |
22-26 knots |
| Draft: |
2' 6" |
Top speed: |
30 knots |
| Fuel: |
225 gals |
Options: |
Crus, Merc 454's |
| Production years: |
1983-1985 |
|
GM 8.2L diesel |
Finally! Here's a boat
that we've been looking to review for years now. The reason
we haven't is because it's a rarity, in production for
only three years, and only several hundred built. We last
ran into one about 6 years ago and was immediately impressed
with it. And haven't seen another one since. Boo.
Express? Well, the express style has
changed over the years, but that doesn't seem to be
the right term. Chris Craft called their similar model
a "sport cruiser" and that's more appropriate,
for this one doesn't resemble anything commonly known
as an express, now or then.
In production only three years? Gee,
the boat must be a turkey or something, huh? Admittedly
at the time it was not a great seller, reportedly somewhere
just above two hundred. But these days there is a much
larger market for this style than there was back in 1984.
Plus, it was more likely the high original price that
caused it to be a drag on the market, rather than the
style. Frankly, I think this boat has everything that
the Bertram 28 does not, yet the 28 today is still quite
popular.
Our review model was provided by Pete
Simonson of Miami who bought her four years ago and promptly
ditched the DD 8.2 litre turkeys that it came with,
repowering her with a new pair of Yanmar 6LP-STE,
300 hp diesels. These engines fit nicely and push her
along at top speed of 30 with a cruise of 25. Pete, an
engineer, has worked out the efficiency curves and says
the 25 knot cruise is ideal, pushing the 3800 RPM diesels
at only 3000. At 16,500 lbs it's not particularly heavy,
nor very light.
 |
 |
| Ergonomics
aren't the best, but at least there's adequate room. |
A
nice fit for a pair of sixes. |
Nor does she have the typical Bertram
super deep vee hull that the builder is famous for, it's
similar to the 33. He readily admits that a 3 foot sea
causes him to throttle back, but still says she handles
better than most. While we didn't get to test her out
in weather, Pete says that she's remarkably dry. With
all that bow flare, it ought to be.
The 30 Express is everything thing that
the 28 is not. Only two feet longer, volumetrically she's
much bigger, including breadth and depth and height. Overall,
it's a very comfortable boat for two to spend some time
on, whereas the 28 is really a day boat. Pete should know
because he's had "Patent Pending" all over the
Bahamas and has run up 750 hours on the new engines in
only two years.
Nice flying bridge and large cockpit
is what this boat is all about. Definitely for the
outdoorsy types, its greatest appeal is to divers and
fishermen. In other words, it's a tropical type
boat, and that's what Bertram designed it for. For seating
a lot of people on the bridge, this is the wrong boat.
This one's got the motor boxes that are raised up above
the deck by only about 8 inches, which makes it a good
place to sit or recline, yet are not high enough to really
get in the way. For people unfamiliar with the boat, there's
tendency to trip over them.
The bridge is the single bench seating
type that's good enough for three, maybe four, but that's
it. The helm console is adequately large with plenty of
space for external mount electronics, but not much space
for the more modern flush mount types. Much of the bridge
space is achieved by making much of the helm area vertical,
which causes the controls not to be well positioned.
Accessibility in the engine spaces with
these engines, and the standard Crusader 454's is quite
good, including with a 4.0 kw Onan generator plus a single
Cruisair air conditioner unit. With the diesels, I could
even climb outboard of the engines. The Onan is toward
the aft end of the compartment and has a removable deck
section above, but is intended to remain sealed.
 |
 |
| Mica
city, but it is durable. An unusual U-lounge with
lots of storage below. |
The cabin has the usual vee berth forward,
followed by a largish shallow but long U-shaped settee
with table in center that easily converts to a large berth.
Opposite is a decent sized galley area with a fair amount
of counter space that is more than sufficient for preparing
meals. There's also quite a bit of storage space and a
fairly large, and not one of those dinky, under-counter
reefers. The head, while smallish, is adequate.
With a glass windshield forward, there's
a sense of greater space than there really is. The window
height is only 16". This keeps out a lot of sun while
letting in plenty of light but not difficult to air condition
with a single unit, which this one was. One interesting
feature is that caught my attention is that only one side
of the forward windshield is an opening type, while the
other side is fixed. And while leaky windshields are always
annoying, I'll take the leaks and the vastly improved
ventilation you get from it over a hot, stuffy cabin any
day. There are always a lot of times when you can't, or
don't want to run the air.
In terms of overall quality, I wouldn't
give it any trophies, though it stands taller than most.
The original fiberboard cockpit side liners have now all
been replaced with Starboard plastic panels. Some of the
deck moldings are not as strong as they should be and
there are some distortions around the engine boxes. Stress
cracking is fairly common in all the usual places, including
along the rub and toe rails. And oh, that lovely Bertram
aluminum rub rail that Pete now has scheduled for a costly
replacement with stainless on top of solid plastic. He's
going to do it like it was done in our MARLIN MONROE review.
It should look great when finished.
The hull is solid glass all around with
the usual balsa cored decks that are holding up fine.
The deck is screwed to the hull but it has a wood backing
on the inside that helps prevent the screws from shearing
through the glass and loosening, as is so common when
decks are just screwed on.
Overall, it's hard not to be impressed
with the simplicity of things and the general ease of
maintenance. One diligent person could keep up with it
easy enough, even 16 years later if starting out with
a boat in fairly good condition.
You'll be interested to know that this
same hull is once again being offered by Bertram as the
30' Moppie model, with a redesigned superstructure that
lacks the house with windows, instead being replaced with
a large, raised coaming and windshield. Basically an open
fisherman. But the point I wanted to make was the opening
bid on the new model starting at $151,600 and gas engines.
By the time you're done fitting out, you're looking at
a $225,00 thirty footer. By comparison, our 1984 listed
for $87,000 with diesels sixteen years ago. Today, this
boat has a resale in the upper $80s to low $90's.
This boat will perform slightly better
with 454's rated at 330-340 hp, but she's a dream boat
in that either Cummins or Yanmars fit nicely and provide
plenty of speed without the need for hot rod diesels that
may blow your budget. You should be able to pick up decently
maintained boats in the $60's so that in adding the cost
of repowering, you still end up well under one hundred
bills without falling overboard in terms of resale. Add
new engines and you should be able to net your full repower
investment cost, or very close to it, with little difficulty.
And by the way, in checking our records
we note that over the last 6 years, there has been NO
decline in resale value whatsoever. A nice, clean boat
that sold for $60k in 1994 still sells for the same price!
Deals like that are hard to come by,
which is what makes boats like this so attractive. It's
old, but stands the test of time with adequate quality,
timeless styling, and a name that wouldn't embarrass anyone.
Plus, you can still add extras without getting in too
deep. Add air or a genny and you still won't take a bath
unless she sinks after your insurance policy has lapsed.
If you find boats that either of these amenities, there's
plenty of space for both.
With fuel costs predicted to hit $2/gallon
in the summer of 2000, this is a great choice for those
contemplating scaling down their appetites for something
larger, newer or more expensive, due to rising fuel costs.
Overall, this is not a 5 star production
boat, but the economics of it certainly rates a five.
| These
are
"reviews",
not surveys, and
bear no resemblance
to our survey
reports. We do not
publish
the results of the
surveys that we
perform. Please note
that the purpose of
these reviews is
educational, to help
you discern the
differences
in quality among
boats generally.
They are not offered
as a means to help
you evaluate any
particular boat
builder. We have no
other
reviews than those
posted. |
|