|
Many boat owners are talking about
this. If you reduce your gallons per hour from 36 to 10
you reduce cost from $151 an hour to around $42, almost
400% savings. From what I read on the forums a lot of people
are going to try cruising at displacement speed since a
lot of diesel boats will do around 8-9 knots at 10 gph.
Gas will probably be a bit more.
The modern power boat is designed for
going fast, not slow. Some will do okay at 9 knots while
for others the ride will be uncomfortable at best. Much
of the reason why has to do with aspect ratios, bean-to-length,
height and centers of gravity. These were all optimized
for planing speeds over 20 knots in the typical “family
cruiser.” A thirty-five foot boat with a 13 foot
beam has the characteristics of a beach ball on water;
that is, it lacks directional stability and will be
like trying to steer a balloon in anything but flat
water. It relies primarily on speed for stability and
control.
I discuss the problem with undersized
rudder further on.
A lot of boat owners who formerly dissed my long standing
criticisms of modern boat design are now going to experience
my reasoning the hard way. Particularly the ones that
look like three story condominiums, but also many of
the Sea Ray express types as well.
Virtually all hull forms have strengths
and weaknesses. If you want to go fast, you have to
give up the qualities that make for stability at slow
speed since stability at various speeds differs. Conversely,
if you want to go slow, you can’t have the characteristics
of high speed and still have stability. The obvious
point here is that with fuel prices what they are, the
only way the vast majority of power boat owners can
afford to use their boast is by going slow, very slow,
which reality has prompted a number of emails asking
about stabilizers.
Hydraulic Stabilizers
I’m no expert on stabilizers but
I do have some experience with them. When Joe Six Pack
asks whether he should put stabilizers on his 40’ Carver
motor yacht, my answer is probably not. The smallest
boat I’ve ever seen stabilizers on was a 42’ Grand
Banks, a deep draft, moderate speed trawler-style hull
with a fairly deep draft and a keel. Bear in mind that
hydraulic fin stabilizers are essentially rudders and
they do steer the boat. The trick is to try to control
roll without steering the boat too much. Either way,
you would not be happy running your stabilizers while
manually steering the boat because they will work you
breathless. Autopilots and stabilizers go together like
salt and pepper.
While I know of no engineering rules
about stabilizers, I would suggest one based on hull-to-length
ratio for this reason: Putting stabilizers on a short,
wide-beamed hull is like putting fins on a ball. That’s
an exaggeration, but it makes the point that when the
ratio is low, stabilizers will tend to decrease stability,
both vertical and directional. They will tend to steer
the boat. This effect was apparent on the Grand Banks,
albeit not to an excessive degree, but it did make the
auto pilot work very hard.
I would suggest that there is a minimum length of 48
feet and a beam-to-length ratio of 1:4. Many boats like
a Sea Ray are closer to 1:3 Unfortunately, this leaves
out most later model boats in existence. Note that the
smaller the boat, the lower the ratio is likely to be.
The main problem here is that the three
stabilizer manufacturers all make them sized for larger
yachts and the fin sizes are huge and so are the mechanical
parts. They simply won't fit on a smaller boat. Once
they perceive a need for them on smaller boats, this
may change. Wesmar offers the smallest stabilizer system
which has a fin length of 25” which is probably
too large for anything under 40’.
If your boat doesn’t meet these dimensions but
you want to seriously consider stabilizers, I’d
recommend that you pay a few bucks to a naval architect
and get some sound advice before investing a huge sum.
I don’t think I’d put my trust in a manufacturer
for advice of this magnitude.
Boats like old Hatterases are prime candidates. Because
of their weight, depth and keels, they have hulls much
more suitable to trawler-like speeds.
Of course hydraulic stabilizers aren’t the only
kind; there are fixed bilge keels as well that can increase
stability without causing steerage problems. Any type
of appendage added to a flat bottomed speedster will
retard rapid rolling, slewing, yawing and even pitching
somewhat. Bilge keels are longitudinal, shallow fins
added to the chine area of a hull, usually a round bilge
boat, but I can conceive of designing something for
a hard chine as well. These would tend to be more horizontal
than vertical, say 30-45 degrees from horizontal. The
idea of adding a centerline keel is probably cost prohibitive.
Yet another problem with slow cruising are the tiny
rudders found on most high speed boats. In most cases
small rudders won’t provide adequate control at
slow speed. While it seemed okay in calm water, in seaway
the boat either becomes uncontrollable or it works you
to death keeping it on course. Or, using the autopilot,
the pilot becomes overworked and suffers breakdowns.
The typical modern (and very cheap) autopilot is a lightweight
and unlikely to hold up to low speed cruising. While
I haven’t investigated this, the cost of changing
to larger rudders where control problems are acute may
not be excessive.
* * * * *
Another question I’m hearing concerns running
diesels at slow speeds. It’s true that high speed
diesels are not designed to run at slow speeds and can
suffer from carbonization. I’ve long recommended “blowing
the cobwebs out” after a long day of trolling,
but slow speed cruising is not the same as trolling
since it lasts longer. I’d recommend that you
contact the engine manufacturer or a top-notch bolt-turner.
Really Good mechanics (check with the guys at Boat Diesel.com)
often know more than the guys that made the engine.
For many engines there are possibly some modifications
along the lines of “detuning” and cooling
system adjustments that can be made that will reduce
the carbonization problem. For all Detroits, among other
adjustments, the injector sizes can be reduced to eliminate
low speed over-fueling.
Note that low heat level is the primary
culprit of carbonization along with over-fueling, so
changing thermostats or other cooling or aspiration
system adjustments to raise low speed temperature, or
air flow may be in order.
Gas engines can experience the same carbonization
problems as diesels, though true fuel injection systems
(not throttle body type) are better at metering fuel
at low speed. Check your temperature at your selected
cruise speed. If it's not close to 180 you should probably
change to a thermostat that will bring the temperature
up to that range. My experience is that at around 160
heavy carbon build up begins to occur. But be aware
that this may result in overheating at high speed. I
check for carbonization in a gas engine by checking
spark plugs occasionally; it’s a good tell. Another
is sooty particles in the exhaust water when you first
start up.
In case you don’t know, running
on a single engine will damage some, but not all transmissions
since the propeller on the down engine spins, turning
the gears, but not fast enough to provide lubrication.
Thus the bearings burn up and you don’t know why.
Save yourself some expensive repairs and check with
a dealer about your gearbox before running on one engine
for long periods. A monkey wrench can make a decent
shaft brake as long as you don’t forget it's there
and try to run the engine with it in place.
If you do run on one engine, don’t forget about
fuel management. You don’t want to run one tank
down and forget that. Rare is the modern sea rocket
that has an equalizer system. No, not rare – unheard
of. Fortunately, it is not difficult or particularly
expensive to install one. An equalizer simply maintains
both tanks at equal levels, which is a much better situation
when using fuel at low rates. For one thing, you do
not want to keep fuel in the tanks for too long because
of bacteria build up, among other problems. You must
have water separating filters with sight bowl so that
you can monitor water and debris accumulation before
fuel system failure occurs due to clogged filters.
It's best to draw down both tanks equally
even if you only fill up half-way. Water will accumulate
more rapidly when tanks are maintained full or near
full. Yes, you read that correctly -- this is due to
the lack of agitation that is much more pronounced when
fuel levels are lower. This, in turn, results in scavenging
water and debris from the bottom which is then removed
by the filters. If you’re not using much fuel,
it's better to maintain the tanks at half level so that
you’ll refuel
more often and keep it fresh. Most water comes either
from the fuel suppliers tanks or leaking deck fills.
Note here that many deck fills are going to leak a little.
We’re talking a matter of droplet size amounts
here, but they do add up over time. If you are getting
water, check the O-ring on the cap, make sure it's there
and not damaged. Many caps simply don’t have an
O-ring seal and rely entirely on the threads to keep
water out.
Posted May 14, 2008 |